Lessons from Europe and Singapore: Transport – Part 1


This article and the next few following it, is based on my experiences from a recent holiday in Europe.

One of the first things I did upon arrival into London was be shown how to ride their transport system. My mate Dave who has been living in London with his wife met me at Heathrow Airport. He made sure I had an Oyster card, which would enable me to ride on the buses. Each day Dave and I got a ticket from Maidenhead into London Paddington railway station. From there we either went walking or used the Oyster card to get on the bus network. Both seemed to be well used no matter which direction we went.

Integrated light right/bus platform at Skansen, Stockholm. (R. GLENNIE)

But it was in Sweden, in Stockholm and Gothenburg that I was able to see a well organized rail and bus system at work. I was able to experience the fast train from Stockholm Arlanda, which travelled into the central city at 180km/h and took about 20 minutes. It was also amazingly quiet inside. From central station it was just a short walk to get onto light rail going in all directions or the buses, which shared platforms with the light rail (see photo). Again, all seemed to be well patronized. I could buy a pass for several days which expired shortly after I left.

Could such systems work here? In Auckland I think the population is big enough that a scaled down system could, but there would need to be a change in the mindset. It would also need to overcome reliability and supply (capacity)problems that still need work done on them. It would need to look at Gothenburg whose population is around 1.5 million, rather than Stockholm.

Wellington has a well used railway system as it is. I am not sure that other than improving what already exists, and being a city of 400,000 people I am not sure that the demand for a larger more comprehensive network already exists. It would be challenging given the city’s geography essentially confines development to two distinct corridors.

What of the South Island cities?

Neither Dunedin or Christchurch are big enough for this sort of planning. Where Christchurch’s strength lies is in its bus network, which is a work in progress. Badly damaged in the earthquakes and let down by some poor planning decisions a spoke and rim network similar to what already exists, but with wider reaching bus services, is the way to go.

Dunedin is further compromised. Its population of 120,000 might be strengthened by a core bus system with an exchange along its one way street system. Its hilly terrain, which includes the steepest street in the world (Baldwin Street) means limitations exist in terms of geographical layout options.

The rise of petrol prices, caused both by taxes being introduced and high international tensions is not likely to bring any relief at the petrol pump any time soon. Whilst biofuel has potential, it is likely to be a complementary source instead of a replacement for petroleum and political reluctance to invest in such sources is slowing its introduction down. That only serves to prolong the pain in peoples wallets.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.