Why New Zealand and Pacific Islands need to stand against whaling

This is not about scientific research, irrespective of what you hear from the Japanese Government and the fishing crews. It is about what it has always been about: killing whales for commercial consumption as food.

Japan has an appalling record of whaling, alongside Iceland and Norway, which carry out similar activities in the northern Atlantic Ocean in equally hostile environments.

I want to see Japanese whalers barred from entering all ports in Pacific basin countries other than their own. New Zealand has always been one of the more admirable nations when criticizing Japan on the subject of whaling. But it is time to step up a notch and flatly deny them use of our ports.

The case for not slaughtering whales is compelling. Aside from being a highly unethical industry to be a part of, whales make substantial environmental contributions. A whale has significant natural ability to absorb carbon. A sperm whale for example could absorb a similar level of carbon to 694 acres of forest.

There is a second strong strand of reasoning for supporting the end of whaling. Whale watch tours contribute substantially to the local economy of many countries. In New Zealand the marine environment off the coast of the seaside town of Kaikoura is a natural home to whales. Here a deep canyon starts just a couple kilometres off the coast from South Bay on the south side of the Kaikoura Peninsula. It quickly plunges from the beach to 6,000+ feet below sea level in just a few kilometres. Because this is where the plankton and other food that they feed on is most concentrated it brings whales in close to the shore and it is not at all uncommon to see whales, orca, dolphins and seals.

Pacific Island nations can be helped to develop such tourism projects as well. Many of them have a wide range of whales and other sea life in transit passing through their waters. It would be a potentially significant source of income and help prop up economies that are going to suffer heavily as a result of climate change impacts on their physical environment.

Whilst Japan can be made to move out of the Antarctic fisheries, it is important to note that the closer one gets to Japanese whalers the more resistance they will put up. Indeed the whaling programme in Taji is the site of what environmentalists consider to be mass murder, as the sea turns a bloody shade of red from the mammals being slaughtered. Documenting this is a dangerous exercise as the whalers are extremely hostile to anyone who tries, with scuffles, blocking of all media and threats of prosecution to anyone watching. Not only that, but the Japanese police in Taji are considered to be sympathetic to the whalers.

It is important to raise this issue as a bloc of New Zealand + Pacific Island nations. We cannot rely on Australia to support this as long as the ruling Liberal-National coalition remains in office, but in order to stand up to super power interference, the island nations are too weak to stand on their own.


Banning plastic bags tackles small part of a big problem

Yesterday the Government announced that New Zealand would phase out plastic bags within 12 months. The announcement, which was made by Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Associate Minister for the Environment Eugenie Sage comes amid a growing backlash against single use plastics.

The announcement, whilst welcome is in some respects more of a feel good measure. Whilst single use plastic bags are a very visible part of the plastics problem in New Zealand, in terms of the larger waste issue, plastic bags are a relative minor issue. Paper, glass, wood, materials such as polystyrene and so forth will continue to get dumped in landfills or recycled at negligible rates. Electronic waste will continue to go into landfills at between 72,000 and 85,000 tons per annum with only 1% of that being recycled.

The announcement did not escape criticism. David Seymour, Leader of the A.C.T. Party said it would punish consumers who find the bags easy and convenient. He also attacked the lack of science qualifications held by Green Party Members of Parliament. Nor did it escape criticism from the Leader of the Opposition, Simon Bridges who likened it to low hanging fruit and that no real gains would be made. Mr Bridges claimed that the Government had bigger problems on its hands and needed to address what he called “plummeting business confidence”.

Both of these criticisms come from desperate politicians wanting to undermine something that they know will be well received by the public of New Zealand. Much has been made of the growing number of seabirds, fish and other marine life being found to have died from consuming plastics that their bodies are not able to digest. One also cannot ignore the Great Pacific Garbage Patch in the central part of the northern Pacific that has an estimated 5 trillion pieces of plastic in it. That is about 680 pieces of plastic for every single human being on the planet.

I doubt that, despite the incoming ban, plastic bags will actually be fully phased out. Several questions need to be asked – and answered about this:

  1. How will the Government deal with imported products that come in plastic bags – last time I got an electrical device there were about three small plastic bags each with a component relevant to the device. They were single use bags in that once opened there was no further use for the plastic.
  2. Will there remain drop off bins after the ban takes effect for those who have stockpiles of plastic bags? I suspect that there will always be a small number of plastic bags retained by New Zealanders and there will be people all over the country with a cupboard holding a few, just as my parents have.
  3. Businesses seem to be enthusiastic about the ban, but there will always be a few that are non-compliant. Will the Government enforce the ban somehow?

All in all, a nice feel good ban. Greenpeace and the other environmental N.G.O.’s might be happy, but the war on waste has a long way to go before it reaches anything approaching a successful conclusion.

The Tasman Sea heat wave

A major heatwave has arrived in New Zealand, and its signature is big enough to be picked up on satellites.

But this heatwave is different, in that it is not happening in the air. Whilst it is certainly true that parts of the South Island are experiencing very warm and in some cases, record breaking, temperatures, the source of heat is different. A muggy warm northerly airflow over New Zealand is dragging tropical air down from the Coral Sea.

The heatwave I am talking about is in the Tasman Sea. At the Port of Lyttelton on the east coast of the South Island it was 17ºC in January 2017. A year later it is 22ºC. Atmospheric imaging of the Tasman Sea shows that much of its area as well as the seas around the rest of New Zealand are generally warmer than they were in 2017.

Currently sea temperatures in the Tasman Sea are about 6ºC above normal. National Institute of Weather and Atmospherics (N.I.W.A.)data shows that not since before 1900 has there been a year when sea water temperatures in the Tasman Sea were this high. Likewise, the American National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (N.O.A.A.) thermal imagery shows a large red blob in the Tasman basin and the rest of New Zealand surrounded by yellow.

The same thermal anomalies in the sea that are causing this heat wave are also the same ones that enable low pressure systems to suddenly deepen rapidly or even explosively and throw up strong storm like conditions. It is over these seas that features such as the January 2017 weather bomb event, where a low pressure system over the Tasman Sea suddenly became a significant storm with 300 millimetres of rain at Arthurs Pass and various locations along the Southern Alps and West Coast in 24 hours and storm force winds in many locations.

The heatwave might be good for people seeking some nice warm seawater to swim in. However it is potentially stressful for marine life and there are concerns that it might be linked to any near future die offs, of shell and kelp forests. The warm sea water has also been linked to the earlier than normal arrival of blue bottle jellyfish.

How long this warm sea water lingers for is unknown. An approaching low pressure system in the Tasman Sea is expected to deliver heavy rain to the West Coast on Wednesday with showery conditions in its wake across New Zealand.

The joys of living in a maritime climate.

Storm reminds New Zealand of importance of coastal protection

Sand dunes at New Brighton in 2009. R. GLENNIE

When I was at intermediate school in 1992 we had a day off at the end of term due to a large low pressure system coughing up a heavy snow event. Aside from causing a complete province wide shut down, the tail end of the storm brought a massive southeasterly swell that battered the gently sloping sandy beaches of Pegasus Bay and cut away metres of slope. Over the coming months and maybe years, long shore drift moved the sediment back into place. But there was a lesson for any coastal management planner and physical geographer in this: protect your coastal communities or pay the price.

Decades later and having watched another battery of New Zealand beaches, this time caused by a sub tropical depression turning into a deep low that drove huge waves ashore along the eastern coast line of New Zealand, I cannot help but wonder if we have learnt anything?

If we look at the damage left behind and the grief that even 2 days after it began to move away, it caused those local communities, I would guess the answer to the question is: no. Despite the seas having been across the roads before, despite previous erosion problems, it seemed to escape peoples minds that these were not such big storms.

The coastal geographers have been warning New Zealanders for decades. Way back when I was in high school there was a section of the community in Christchurch who wanted to remove the sand dunes in Christchurch because they were affecting property prices. No one wanted to know about the potential for storm surge during large southerly storms or sub-tropical lows. Nor did they want to know about the tsunami risk posed by earthquakes both near field and far field. To them, these were things that happened elsewhere.

Few will forget the appalling video clips from Japan showing the sea sweeping all before it during the huge tsunami that followed the magnitude 9.0 11 March 2011 earthquake. Watching entire coastal communities succumb to the ferocious power unleashed by these waves is not an easy watch. And now there is no doubt among coastal communities that we have to be prepared for tsunami. But what about the storm surge from weather events that pass through every few years or so? Especially when they virtually demolish coastal roads and flood whole communities?

Christchurch seems to have headed the warnings to leave natural coastal protection alone. Whilst plans for revitalizing New Brighton continue talking about the residents, and making it a more attractive area for tourists, few now seem to have the appetite that existed in the late 1990’s for removing the dunes.

But with potential climate change and change in local marine topography over time, the behaviour of the sea will change. The tide that used to stop two metres down the beach might now be lapping the upper edge of the beach. Wave energy on the coast helps to determine the type of beach one gets – will it be gently sloping like New Brighton with its dunes or a high energy environment where no one can safely swim, such as Birdlings Flat? Are you right at sea level on the coast, or do you have a couple of metres altitude to protect you from coastal flooding?

One might have ignored those questions in the past, but can you ignore them in the future?

Protecting the whitebait fishery in New Zealand

Whitebait are a New Zealand delicacy. Every year hundreds of people try their hand at catching the tasty translucent morsels that enter our coastal waterways. On the market, a kilogram of whitebait may fetch N.Z.$90.

Whitebait patties are how most whitebait that are caught end up. Their popularity is enduring by virtue of the relative ease and speed of making them. They were the entree at the A.P.E.C. 1999 State Banquet held for the then United States President Bill Clinton and the Chinese President Jiang Zemin.

But whitebait are in danger of extinction. Their immense popularity, damage to their habitat and (this is debatable)over fishing of the delicacy, which have five subspecies in New Zealand – climbing galaxias, common galaxias, banded kokopu, shortjaw kokopu and giant kokopu have brought about severe challenges for a popular recreational past time. This has brought with it, talk of possibly closing the fishery for a period of one or two years during which there is a complete ban on whitebaiting, with the idea being that whitebait would be able to regain some of their population.

Whitebait habitat damage, and in particular their spawning grounds is the most serious threat they face. A spawning ground might be only a couple standard glass houses in area, but in that area tens of thousands of whitebait will be depositing their eggs, and the destruction of that one spawning ground might be the difference between whether or not that particular river/stream/creek/estuary/lagoon has a meaningful whitebait population the following year.

I and my father whitebait each year. We have no problems with compliance and follow local regulations specific to the Canterbury area and fisheries. We do it because we enjoy eating whitebait and are not there to make a profit from doing so, which some are – our purpose has always been to put food on the table, which is what I believe all hunting and fishing should be about. We do not leave any litter or other debris behind that might enter their habitat and cause adverse effects.

Pollutants entering the habitat – cigarette butts, plastics, and so forth – are another threat that needs to be considered. This is a general common pollution issue that should be dealt with separately by way of enforcement action by local council rangers. Fines and – most appropriately – making the offender participate in a rubbish clean up would be a good way of getting the message across.

No quotas exist for whitebaiters. It is debatable whether there needs to be quotas. One will immediately ask, if quotas exist, how are they going to be enforced and the only answer from hard experience is by ground enforcement on the spot. There would need to be many rangers enforcing the quotas and there is a possibility that they would – like anyone involved in law enforcement – possibly have to deal with hostile people. The quota size itself would also be up for debate. Sometimes several kilogrammes of whitebait might be caught each day, and then there might be none or little for several days or even weeks – nearly all we caught this year was taken in the final week of the season.

Whitebaiters are permitted to whitebait from dawn to dusk. They are allowed nets and gobi’s (nylon fencing on poles)that extend from the net to the shore. The combined net/gobi arrangement cannot take up more than 1/3 of a channel width and must be manned at all times. A whitebait net cannot be less than 20 metres from another whitebait net. The season start time varies from one region to the next – the Canterbury one started in mid-August and ended at sunset 30 November.

I don’t want any children I might eventually have or anyone else who has children to be denied the opportunity to show them an easy and fun – albeit sometimes patience testing – mode of fishing. So, let us enjoy our whitebait, but apply a bit of common sense and protect the habitats, don’t take more than you want to use and respect the other whitebaiters who have come to try their luck.

Common sense really.